Sebastian Coe doesn’t need the likes of me to spring to his defence. And Coe has probably long got used to the fact that, being a high flyer means that there will always be someone wanting to shoot him down in flames. But arts critic Charlotte Higgins took a stray pot-shot at Lord Coe in the Guardian a few days ago.
Higgins did an excellent job in describing the dog’s dinner that are plans for the Cultural Olympiad to accompany London 2012. But her comprehensive critique was diminished somewhat when she took Coe to task for daring to cite Leni Riefenstahl as an example of a great Olympic artist.
Now, whatever one may think of Riefenstahl’s association with Hitler and his mob (and despite her denials, there should be little doubt on that score), Olympia, her film of the 1936 Games in Berlin is a tour de force. It is not only a great Olympic documentary (Kon Ichikawa’s Tokyo Olympiad is but a distant rival; the rest nowhere), but also a landmark in world cinema, in which Riefenstahl single-handedly invents the grammar of what would become televised sport.
Riefenstahl is arguably the modern equivalent of Pindar, whose odes to Ancient Olympic victors were as important as any of his other work. Incidentally, to the ancients, intellectual or high culture was inseparable from physical culture, which may come as a surprise to those watching modern Olympic competition on television, oblivious to any ancillary ‘cultural’ events going on.
It is no small irony therefore that the infamous line, ‘Whenever I hear culture, I reach for my pistol,’ is variously attributed to Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler or Goering. It is indisputably Nazi, but is a paraphrase of a line in a work, Schlageter, by Nazi poet laureate and playwright, Hanns Johst.
For a comprehensive evaluation of the long and extraordinary life of Riefenstahl and the Nazi era which so thoroughly compromised it, I can recommend Audrey Salkeld’s, A Portrait of Leni Riefenstahl, published over a decade ago.
Riefenstahl was already an accomplished director, formerly a dancer and actor, on ‘berg’ (mountain) films, seen as the German equivalent of the western movie, whose ethic of self-reliance was an ideal match for the philosophy of the rising Nazi party. Despite the animosity of Goebbels, who was nominally in charge of all filming during the Third Reich, Hitler was prepared to give her carte-blanche to be his personal movie-maker.
Riefenstahl readily nailed her colours to the mast of National Socialism with Triumph of the Will, her film of the 1934 Nuremburg Rally, which is an even more extraordinary work than Olympia. Its technical brilliance and singular narrative thrust make it both one of the most accomplished documentaries in cinema history, and the most disturbing vehicle of propaganda in its virtual deification of Hitler and glorification of the young ‘Aryan’ masses.
Riefenstahl’s ‘regard’ for the naked form, mostly male (which she continued to explore in her later career as a still photographer) has all the homo-erotic overtones associated with her Nazi backers, and accordingly reaches its apotheosis in ‘Triumph’. There are direct echoes in the opening ‘Greek’ sequences of Olympia, but baser are things like the jump cuts from black athletes bounding (in training) to hopping kangaroos in the Berlin zoo, making the same bestial association underlined by the Nazi press which described black US athletes as ‘auxiliaries’.
Yes, Olympia has its faults, and as esteemed British film critic Philip French has said, “leaves a nasty taste in the mouth,” because of the Nazi associations. But if London’s Cultural Olympiad produces anything half as accomplished and resonant, then whatever millions may have been poured in will not have been entirely misspent.

Wot? Culcha in the blogosphere? Next thing you’ll be wanting us to read….books.
Another thought provoking text, Pat. Thank you. I would bet, this one won’t get linked by Let’s Run. I confess, I’ve never seen “Olympia,” much to my shame; but, now, i will.
JOB
Excellent. I will link.
I saw “Triumph of the Will” many years ago at the National Film Theatre.
It was attended by many of the then leaders of the National Front Party , including Colin Jordan ,who cheered and clapped whenever a speech of Hitler’s or anytihng controversial was shown. In any other Country but ours a riot would have broken out. Why are we so tolerant?
Excellent account of Riefenstahl’s artistic achievement, thanks. But the film is indeed more like Pindar than “a great documentary,” which it definitely isn’t. Many of the sequences were staged, unlike Ichikawa’s more authentic “Tokyo.” Riefenstahl’s marathon is a compilation that includes training footage (note changes in uniform & runners suddenly barechested), and intercuts scenes totally out of the sequence of the race; and the pole vault (from memory) was recreated next morning because the light was wrong at the time. There were many such artistic alterations to the actual record. Your Pindar comparison is good, because he too was so far elevated from the actuality of the events – see my “Running in Literature” 26-28.
Riefenstahl’s film is brilliant visually but the commentary is dire, laughable in places. As Roger Robinson points out, many sequences are faked – I recall a shot of Glenn Morris (who later had an affair with Riefenstahl), purportedly competing in the 1500m in the decathlon, but actually running on a turntable! I prefer Ichikawa’s more authentic and atmospheric record of the Tokyo Games.
Roger Robinson and Mel Watman make salient points, and I agree with most of them. As I said, Olympia has its faults. But the staging doesn’t bother me, since there is very little on film which is pure documentary, ie not staged to some degree, even to the extent that when people know they are being filmed, they ‘act’.
But it is both the technical excellence and again, as I wrote, Riefenstahl’s invention of the grammar of filming sport in Olympia, coupled with her encompassing scope that make this a great documentary. The first half hour alone is worth the entry fee – the film is close to four hours, incidentally. Riefenstahl sketches a mythical/legendary past, as an introduction to the torch run (created for Berlin ’36, by the way, and to be discontinued after the demos against the Beijing run).
Tokyo Olympiad, in contrast is anecdotal, it concentrates on half a dozen competitors. I love the Abebe marathon sequence, the slow-motion footage and close-up of his impassive face tell you all you need to know about an athlete in the zone.
Both great films, not just great Olympic films.